Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: That's all folks. (Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists)
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 20:44:29
Message-Id: CAHY5MecS_mL9EwWWX_HMPEmcv8LPPwhEEFB-j529JuL7Mm67Hg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: That's all folks. (Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists) by Peter Stuge
1 On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote:
2 > Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
3 >> <comrel hat>
4 >> Independent of whether William now unsubscribed or not, he's now enjoying a
5 >> lengthy (1 year until review) vacation from all Gentoo communication channels.
6 >> </comrel hat>
7 >
8 > I don't understand two things about Gentoo:
9 >
10 > 1. style: How can anyone consider "enjoying a vacation" to be
11 > appropriate wording in this context? That is at a minimum tasteless.
12 >
13 > 2. substance: Why would William be blocked from Gentoo for a year?
14 >
15 > How and/or where will these two points be clarified?
16 >
17 >
18 > Thanks
19 >
20 > //Peter
21
22 Second that. Such a long thread about behavior on both sides, and then this from
23 somebody acting officially as comrel? No wonder you're getting abuse.