1 |
Have you tried typing dmesg to see the kernel messages; look to see if |
2 |
the kernel detected your network card. Also try bringing the interface |
3 |
up manually. ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up |
4 |
|
5 |
If neither of these work, try making the network driver into a module. |
6 |
Then reboot and modprobe the module. Type dmesg and see what the driver |
7 |
message says. |
8 |
|
9 |
-Jared H. |
10 |
|
11 |
On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 20:58, Brian Jones wrote: |
12 |
> Hi all, and thanks, but it's still not working. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I'll have to step away from this to retain my sanity. |
15 |
> I've been hacking around with it on and off all day, |
16 |
> and I'm very, very frustrated. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I compiled a new kernel along with some networking |
19 |
> modules, including winbond-840, the 3c59x module, |
20 |
> tulip.o, and a couple of others to try out. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> What really bothers me is that I've made doubly sure |
23 |
> all of my files are up to date, cat /proc/pci |
24 |
> identifies the device, I've added an alias to |
25 |
> modules.d/aliases AND i386 (alias eth0 <module>), |
26 |
> everything seems in order. My net.eth0 file looks |
27 |
> good, /etc/hosts is in order.... meanwhile, 'lsmod' |
28 |
> lists NO modules being used upon boot, bootup messages |
29 |
> indicate 'eth0: no such device', as does ifconfig, and |
30 |
> modprobing everything under the sun seems to do |
31 |
> nothing at all. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Another thing that bugs me is that I haven't had this |
34 |
> problem in four years - I fixed it then and I can't |
35 |
> fix it now! The sysadmin's nightmare! |
36 |
> |
37 |
> PS - cat /proc/ioports and cat /proc/pci all seem to |
38 |
> get along well with the device. Modprobe -c shows |
39 |
> 'alias eth0 off', but AFAIK, it'll show that since |
40 |
> it's a system default, even if it's overridden by an |
41 |
> entry in modules.conf - correct me if I'm wrong. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> hairless, and fingers bleeding, |
44 |
> /njcajun |
45 |
> --- Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> wrote: |
46 |
> > On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 04:19, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> > > > 2. I'm getting the same error a million times |
49 |
> > while |
50 |
> > > > the boot process is starting the various |
51 |
> > services: |
52 |
> > > > |
53 |
> > > > '/etc/init.d/runscript.sh: 1: command not found' |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> > > > |
56 |
> > > > I also get that same one with '2:' instead of |
57 |
> > '1:' a |
58 |
> > > > bunch of times. |
59 |
> > > |
60 |
> > > I think that this is a cosmetic error that is |
61 |
> > fixed in more recent |
62 |
> > > versions of baselayout, but Azarah (Martin |
63 |
> > Schlemmer) would know more |
64 |
> > > about this than I. |
65 |
> > > |
66 |
> > |
67 |
> > You will basically get this if sleep is not |
68 |
> > accessible. This |
69 |
> > happens usually when you have /usr on a seperate |
70 |
> > partition, |
71 |
> > and your sh-utils is still an old release. Thus, |
72 |
> > when /usr |
73 |
> > is not mounted, /etc/init.d/{runscript.sh,halt.sh} |
74 |
> > cannot find |
75 |
> > sh-utils. |
76 |
> > |
77 |
> > To fix this, make sure you have the latest sh-utils |
78 |
> > installed: |
79 |
> > |
80 |
> > # emerge =sys-apps/sh-utils-2.0.11-r1 |
81 |
> > |
82 |
> > |
83 |
> > Greetings, |
84 |
> > |
85 |
> > -- |
86 |
> > |
87 |
> > Martin Schlemmer |
88 |
> > Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer |
89 |
> > Cape Town, South Africa |
90 |
> > |
91 |
> > |
92 |
> |
93 |
> > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature |
94 |
> |
95 |
> |
96 |
> |
97 |
> __________________________________________________ |
98 |
> Do You Yahoo!? |
99 |
> Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! |
100 |
> http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ |
101 |
> _______________________________________________ |
102 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
103 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
104 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |