| 1 |
Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> All in all I guess we need to make the rules up as we go and decide |
| 3 |
> policy later. I suggest the first herd/address in the list should be |
| 4 |
> the primary contact. If you don't agree with that, please consult |
| 5 |
> metadata.xml for the package or reassign to bug-wranglers with an |
| 6 |
> explanation (and perhaps a promise to quickly change metadata.xml. :) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
We're using XML 1.0 and as far as I know (please correct me if I'm wrong) |
| 9 |
does the specification not guarantee element order. And because of this I |
| 10 |
don't understand why we're not introducing a new attribute (let's call |
| 11 |
it "primary_maintainer") which can be set to "true" for the primary |
| 12 |
herd/maintainer (and which is being interpreted as "false" if not present). |
| 13 |
Then it's clear which address has to be put in Bugzilla's "Assigned To:" |
| 14 |
field... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Cheers, |
| 17 |
Tiziano |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives