| 1 |
Achim Gottinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > Since Suse 7.1 ships with 2.4/reiserfs I think this problem is solved. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well it seems to be still unsolved. |
| 7 |
> I tested the lates kernel 2.4.1-ac17 with and without nfs and lvm patches all with |
| 8 |
> the same result. |
| 9 |
> I posted a message to the reiserfs mailinglist. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Here are the answers |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well, this is known weakness of reiserfs in its current state: it creates very |
| 15 |
big holes in file very poorly. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Thanks, |
| 18 |
vs |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
This isn't a bug, its a design flaw. reiserfs creates a little slower than |
| 21 |
ext2 does, and this test is really benchmarking the hole creation speed. |
| 22 |
We don't do it quickly, but the holes do get created. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-chris |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
------------------- |
| 27 |
I added a patch to the lates glibc-2.2.2 package that increases the timeout in |
| 28 |
test-lfs so it should compile. |
| 29 |
Since there are other problems with glibc-2.2.2/binutils-2.1.10.0.7 I will update |
| 30 |
glibc-2.2.1 too. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
achim~ |
Archives