Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, security@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Decoupling stabilization from security bugs
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:06:22
Message-Id: YRU45fV+B15ZeGnu@Aaron-Baumans-MacBook-Pro.local
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Decoupling stabilization from security bugs by "Michał Górny"
1 On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 02:53:33PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > Hello, everyone.
3 >
4 > TL;DR: I'd like to propose that stabilizations are done via blockers of
5 > security bugs instead of security bugs themselves, i.e. as any other
6 > stabilizations.
7 >
8 >
9 > Right now we're often performing security-related stabilizations via
10 > security bugs. This has a few problems, that are:
11 >
12
13 <snip>
14
15 > WDYT?
16
17 I welcome this change. Let's do it.
18
19 -Aaron

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature