| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 7 Feb 2004, at 11:57, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 6 |
> If so, perhaps the 'python-updater' message in the python upgrade |
| 7 |
> should be stronger, because you are saying that the one-and-only |
| 8 |
> guaranteed order of things for this particular operation is: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You mean being in gentoo-announce and on #gentoo's topic is not strong |
| 12 |
enough? A clarification of the problem here is not that you are running |
| 13 |
python-2.3, but because your python version was older than |
| 14 |
python-2.2.3-r5 and hence did not have the patches that prevented it |
| 15 |
from trying to make .pyc's inside sandbox. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It has nothing to do with running or not python-updater. BTW, how is it |
| 18 |
possible that python's emerge came after portage? I haven't seen that |
| 19 |
behaviour before. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Cheers, |
| 22 |
- -- |
| 23 |
Alastair 'liquidx' Tse |
| 24 |
>> Gentoo Developer (Python/GNOME/CJK/PDA/Bluetooth) |
| 25 |
>> http://www.liquidx.net/ | http://dev.gentoo.org/~liquidx/ |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iD8DBQFAJRqNOM4cezkHFPYRAhfeAKCmoKtufcbRDyTZd3i2/papTq2sKwCfZKXS |
| 30 |
MfSqJlPxqTn+aJVwR0M8ZiA= |
| 31 |
=2HqW |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives