| 1 |
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras: |
| 2 |
> On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with |
| 7 |
> >> the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to |
| 8 |
> >> get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide |
| 9 |
> >> where to put them. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> Suggestion: new category office-ext |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> What do you think? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > office-plugins, to follow suit. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work |
| 18 |
> with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for |
| 19 |
> libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have |
| 20 |
> already suggested |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office |
| 23 |
variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with |
| 24 |
anything that uses the so-called "uno bridge". |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This is why I like the new category "office-plugins" best... and would like to |
| 27 |
implement that one. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Any additional objections? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Cheers, Andreas |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 36 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 37 |
kde (team lead), sci, tex, arm, printing |
| 38 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 39 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives