Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Kursawe <phosphan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] impending gcc-config doom
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:01:13
Message-Id: 20041014140111.GA26379@zaphod.anachem.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] impending gcc-config doom by Mike Frysinger
1 On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:03:14AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Thursday 14 October 2004 05:20 am, Patrick Kursawe wrote:
3 > > Perhaps changing flag-o-matic accordingly would be a good idea?
4 >
5 > flag-o-matic has nothing to do with this, these arent flags
6 >
7 > use gcc.eclass (man gcc.eclass) or use the new toolchain-functions.eclass (no
8 > documentation yet, PHEAR IT)
9
10 $ grep -n '${CC' /usr/portage/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass
11
12 267: local cc=${CC:-gcc} ; cc=${cc%% *}
13 276: local cc=${CC:-gcc} ; cc=${cc%% *}
14 350: ${CC/ .*/} -m64 -o /dev/null ${temp}.c > /dev/null 2>&1
15 364: ${CC/ .*/} -m32 -o /dev/null ${temp}.c > /dev/null 2>&1
16
17 Looks exactly like what you said shouldn't be done, doesn't it?
18
19 Bye, Patrick

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] impending gcc-config doom Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>