Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:36:50
Message-Id: 20100426203606.7a0bd231@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 Hi,
2
3 "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>:
4 > How about the following instead, going into the status whiteboard:
5 > AT:x86:+
6 > AT:x86:-
7 > AT:x86:?
8 > with the same meanings that you defined.
9 >
10 > It should be just as easy to search, and you can do it today already.
11
12 Yes, sounds good. What is the best way to document it apart from the
13 various AT FAQs?
14
15 V-Li
16
17 --
18 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
19 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
20
21 <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature