Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:40:23
Message-Id: 1515663612.5212.1.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change by "Aaron W. Swenson"
1 On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 20:00 -0500, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
2 > On 2018-01-10 22:53, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:48:32 -0500
4 > > "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> wrote:
5 > > > Modified a bit. This should show for anyone who has GnuCash
6 > > > installed.
7 > >
8 > > For anyone who has any version of GnuCash installed, either now or
9 > > at
10 > > any point in the future. (See the recent thread on expiring news
11 > > items...) Are you sure you don't just want to target this at people
12 > > who
13 > > have the old version installed, instead?
14 >
15 > As mentioned, the concern is that someone will try to use a new
16 > version
17 > and old version simultaneously.
18 >
19 > How about “<app-office/gnucash-4"? It would allow it to "expire"
20 > after
21 > quite some time. At least past the point that we'd be concerned
22 > about,
23 > I'm sure.
24
25 That sounds good to me. The background here is, that once 2.7 is
26 released as stable, it'll be released as version 3.0, so 4 is after
27 that.
28 And then if they keep doing 3.2, 3.4 and so on for a long time instead,
29 you can try to remember to tweak the news item to expire before, e.g to
30 a version that drops forward migration support from 2.6.
31
32 This is all on the premise, that it's a leaf package and only kept
33 shown to those that have it.
34
35
36 Mart