Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP33: Eclass restructure
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:29:40
Message-Id: 200502220731.00797.danarmak@gentoo.org
1 On Saturday 19 February 2005 18:34, Brian Harring wrote:
2 > Here's a question, what are -you're- intentions for elibs Dan? We've
3 > already laid out how portage, and eutils would benefit- in other words,
4 > what will be moved to elibs already.
5 OK, I've no further objections to the GLEP. As I've said before on this
6 thread, I don't see a big advantage in this part of the GLEP (I do see the
7 advantage in the other parts), but I don't see a real disadvantage either, so
8 if you want to do it, that's OK with me.
9
10 --
11 Dan Armak
12 Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
13 Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
14 Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP33: Eclass restructure Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP33: Eclass restructure Gustavo de Lama <solouno@××××××××××.net>