Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] To enable ssp default in Gcc the toolchain.eclass need some changes. | ||
| Date: | Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:59:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_kugwgADmcbpfsm8=g9O59L49BWQg-FTGgAFfUJM_1jww@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] To enable ssp default in Gcc the toolchain.eclass need some changes. by "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina |
| 2 | <zerochaos@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > I never felt manipulating cflags with use flags was a great idea, but in |
| 4 | > this case is does feel extra pointless. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Tend to agree, though one place I could see it being hypothetically |
| 8 | useful is if we need to set a use-dep. That is, package bar might |
| 9 | have a dep on dev-lib/libfoo[-ssp] (or nossp or whatever). |
| 10 | |
| 11 | However, what I don't know is whether that will be helpful. If it is, |
| 12 | then it might make sense to make an exception, otherwise I agree that |
| 13 | overloading CFLAGS in USE flags is bad. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] To enable ssp default in Gcc the toolchain.eclass need some changes. | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |