Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model | ||
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:41:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20141120014143.3e278a74@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model by "vivo75@gmail.com" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:36:11 +0100 |
| 2 | "vivo75@×××××.com" <vivo75@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > >> At that point it is forked. I don't see what's wrong with forking. |
| 5 | > > Forking wouldn't be the problem. Duplication of effort would be the |
| 6 | > > problem. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > worse, mutually incompatibility would be much worse |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I was talking about what is problematic about the act of creating |
| 11 | another instance in a different overlay. Not about the |
| 12 | well-known problems that ensue afterwards. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | jer |