1 |
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:07:04 +1000 |
2 |
"Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wraeth@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > What then is the benefit? If what is installed is the same from |
5 |
> > package manager or binpkg. Also your redistributing another's |
6 |
> > package in binary format which may not be legally allowed. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The difference is that how the package manager/ebuild installs the |
9 |
> package may be better suited to the environment than what upstream |
10 |
> expects (such as upstreams that install through a .run file) |
11 |
|
12 |
I fail to see how basically skipping src_install and maybe some prepare |
13 |
stuff that makes it better suited to an environment. |
14 |
Can you explain that further? |
15 |
|
16 |
These packages are just exploded tarballs. I fail to see the benefit |
17 |
to repacking those into another tarball to be exploded. At best |
18 |
skipping src_install and/or prepare, seems to be the only difference. |
19 |
|
20 |
I see no difference in installing kernel sources via source ebuild or a |
21 |
binpkg, pre-built ebuild binary. Other than the time it takes to |
22 |
re-package the kernel sources into another tarball. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |