1 |
On 06/19/2013 08:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 06/19/2013 07:59 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
3 |
>> I was surprised by repoman just dropping FEATURES="sign" . I'm aware |
4 |
>> that at that time it has to commit an updated Manifest to prevent |
5 |
>> breakages, so if gpg fails it proceeds, but is there something it could |
6 |
>> do to check gpg sanity before committing anything? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It seems the simplest way to go would be to do a test signature before |
9 |
> commit, as suggested here: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298605 |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Is it okay to assume that everyone uses gpg-agent, so they won't have to |
14 |
> enter the passphrase more than once? |
15 |
|
16 |
Or, we could skip the test signature if the GPG_AGENT_INFO variable is |
17 |
not set? |
18 |
-- |
19 |
Thanks, |
20 |
Zac |