| 1 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:10:05 +0900 |
| 2 |
heroxbd@g.o wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> >> I am curious about the slowness of emerge. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Try a --backtrack=0 approach, I no longer need to increase it. :) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> on a random box: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> time emerge --backtrack=0 -pe @world |
| 13 |
> [...] |
| 14 |
> real 0m30.016s |
| 15 |
> user 0m29.268s |
| 16 |
> sys 0m0.704s |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> time emerge -pe @world |
| 19 |
> [...] |
| 20 |
> real 0m35.037s |
| 21 |
> user 0m30.824s |
| 22 |
> sys 0m1.136s |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> not a big difference? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Well, it has to actually backtrack to make a difference; if there's no |
| 27 |
need to, it won't differ. But when there is need to, it takes longer. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
That's why it has been described as dynamic; you are either affected by |
| 30 |
a lot of backtracking or you don't, seems you are on the lucky side now. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
With kind regards, |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 36 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 39 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 40 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives