| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 21-12-12 13:32, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 21 December 2012 17:36, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 6 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:21:57 +0000 Markos Chandras |
| 8 |
>> <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
>>> Your tone is not appropriate for discussion. If you don't like |
| 10 |
>>> the existing policy, bring it to the list with a better |
| 11 |
>>> attitude so we can try and discuss it. But given that you want |
| 12 |
>>> to pick a fight with your email, I will most likely ignore |
| 13 |
>>> this thread and keep doing our job like we do for many years. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m93x01rSVK1qjvxfho1_1280.jpg |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> And that also makes a convenient way to always ignore the tone of |
| 18 |
> an argument, regardless of whether it is justified or not. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
You say that as if it is a bad thing. If we were all a little less |
| 21 |
easily offended, communication would be more effective. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> I find that Markos' objection is not unfounded and your argument |
| 24 |
> is irrelevant here. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
It is fine to discuss tone too, but let's not use tone as an argument |
| 27 |
to not respond to content. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Marijn |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlDq5M4ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2zqOQCfX0jBZy8i/jH6rVTvONN4/d5u |
| 36 |
gKkAnRK54RHeUXgJLYfVm5+VL76xXrzQ |
| 37 |
=MqQO |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives
