| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:31:29AM -0700, Tim Harder wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2011-08-24 Wed 00:21, Diego Elio Petten?? wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Il giorno mar, 23/08/2011 alle 23.52 -0700, Tim Harder ha scritto: |
| 4 |
> > > I thought xz-utils can be assumed as well since it was added to the |
| 5 |
> > > system set almost six months ago [1]. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > It has really very little to do with being in the system set or not. And |
| 8 |
> > the answer is no, you cannot assume that... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> So then why do bzip2 and gzip get special exceptions? Majority rule? :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Age. Making the mistake once doesn't mean we should make it twice. ;) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Anyway, I think getting implicit unpack depends based on SRC_URI |
| 15 |
> suffixes like Mike mentioned will be great. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Proposals welcome; my personal preference is to see extensions mapped |
| 18 |
into some form of repository configuration... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
~harring |
Archives