Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Benjamin Smee (strerror)" <strerror@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Conversion from kernel-mod.eclass to linux-mod/linux-info
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:37:01
Message-Id: 200601121732.25736.strerror@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Conversion from kernel-mod.eclass to linux-mod/linux-info by Chris Gianelloni
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 lo,
5
6 On Thursday 12 January 2006 17:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
7 > On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:45 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
8 > > AFAIK, cryptsetup should be pulled in favor of cryptsetup-luks. I think
9 > > everything uses luks now rather then cryptsetup.
10 >
11 > We're still using cryptsetup on the InstallCD/LiveCD. Should we switch?
12 > What's the differences?
13
14 Where possible you should be using cryptsetup-luks over cryptsetup. I'm still
15 of two minds about pulling it completely, but at this point cryptsetup-luks
16 has its full functionality, is actively maintained, a drop in replacement and
17 has the blessing of the original cryptsetup author.
18
19 - --
20 Benjamin Smee (strerror)
21 crypto/forensics/netmail/netmon
22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Version: GnuPG v1.9.19 (GNU/Linux)
24
25 iD8DBQFDxpKpAEpm7USL54wRAmZJAJ9v6fWaRbIKX325AFKCvP1o2DF3TACeN3gb
26 0vWLoMgMFWAO4U7uaX+OVcs=
27 =VQNJ
28 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list