Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata/policy.conf: Introduce QA check configuration

[Michał Górny]

On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 02:52 -0800, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:23:49 +0100
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
>
> > Introduce a new configuration file for assigning QA check significance
> > levels to PGnnnn policies.  Long-term goal is that this will permit
> > unified configuration of various QA tools, including pkgcheck, repoman
> > and install-qa-check.d.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
> > ---
> >  metadata/policy.conf | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 metadata/policy.conf
> >
> > diff --git a/metadata/policy.conf b/metadata/policy.conf
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..824598063cc1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/metadata/policy.conf
> > @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> > +# Copyright 2020 Gentoo Authors
> > +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> > +
> > +# The policy section assigns significance levels to various policies.
> > +# Keys are identifiers from the Policy Guide, values are either
> > +# 'notice', 'warninging' or 'error'.
> extra ing here

Fixed.

> > +#
> > +# The rule of thumb is that 'error' indicates a serious problem that
> > +# may cause serious problem to the end users and therefore should block
> > +# committing / deployment.  'Warning' should be fixed by developer
> capital W probably should be w

Sure, fixed.

> > +# but does not need to immediately prevent committing.
> > +#
> > +# https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/std-policy-index.html
> > +
>
> Looks really interesting.
> Will overlays be able to define their own policy ?

That's the idea.

> Maybe rename file to metadata/qa-policy.conf ? just policy.conf is ambiguous.

What other kind of policies do you expect?  ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny