| 1 |
28.2.2006, 18:11:57, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:02:11 +0000 Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:35:32PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
| >> Ebuilds can't override this either. Read on in the eclass and you'll |
| 6 |
| >> notice that it checks that SLOT hasn't been changed to something |
| 7 |
| >> sane. |
| 8 |
> | |
| 9 |
> | Excepting that you can set WEBAPP_MANUAL_SLOT="yes" and set SLOT to |
| 10 |
> | whatever the hell you want. But don't let my facts get in the way of |
| 11 |
> | your nonsense. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> And it sticks out a nasty ewarn and says that the ebuild is probably |
| 14 |
> broken. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Again, you're dismissing QA issues as nonsense, and you wonder why I |
| 17 |
> don't waste my time doing a full audit. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ah, so this is the horrible and nasty ewarn? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
<snip> |
| 22 |
ewarn "This ebuild overrides the default SLOT behaviour for webapps" |
| 23 |
ewarn "If this package installs files into the htdocs dir, this is" |
| 24 |
ewarn "probably a bug in the ebuild." |
| 25 |
</snip> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Sigh... what kind of QA issue is that? Go file bugs about those nasty QA |
| 28 |
notices portage spits out every now and then as well, if you are so |
| 29 |
concerned about warnings. Indeed, please don't waste your time and first of |
| 30 |
all don't waste ours. Go audit whatever you want, but please keep this |
| 31 |
off-list. Or maybe don't stare on the screen if ewarns scare you that much. |
| 32 |
;) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
jakub |
Archives