Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 03:50:28
Message-Id: CAATnKFBn2sZTjTuLLEJ69+TctvL4OPCbnx8DVi+3PAEfGZLtHQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators) by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On 3 June 2012 09:46, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
2 If there are enough "Alice" developers, is it a possibility that Bob
3 > will never have a chance to get his commit in?
4 >
5 > All this requires, is that in the time it takes Bob to do 'git pull',
6 > Alice manages to do 'git push' again.
7 >
8 > Alice can thus deprive Bob of a fair chance to get his commit in.
9 > Bob becomes an unhappy developer and gives up.
10
11 There's an easier solution here:
12
13 Bob pushes to a branch or to a public repo ( ie: github ) , and then
14 contacts Alice ( or somebody else ) who pulls their changes into the
15 tree on their behalf.
16
17 Its not "ideal" but better than nothing. And certainly better than
18 being stuck on SVN where this case is virtually guaranteed and with no
19 viable workarounds when it is encountered.
20
21
22
23 --
24 Kent
25
26 perl -e  "print substr( \"edrgmaM  SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3,
27 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );"
28
29 http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators) Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>