| 1 |
On Saturday 06 January 2007 11:05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 16:42, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > what does it matter if all of the ebuilds declare latest or the eclass |
| 4 |
> > declares latest ? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Weren't we going to allow declaring "1.10 1.9" soon, so that we could stop |
| 7 |
> using "latest" ? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
no, that was not the reason at all for the new syntax |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
the reason was so in the *eclass* you could translate latest to "1.10 1.9" and |
| 12 |
drop the need of executing that helper function in local scope |
| 13 |
-mike |
Archives