Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA bikeshed: killing USE=dedicated in favor of uniform USE=client+server
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:19:06
Message-Id: 55D6524C.7020201@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA bikeshed: killing USE=dedicated in favor of uniform USE=client+server by "Jason A. Donenfeld"
1 On 08/21/2015 12:06 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
2 > This seems quite reasonable, and I welcome QA's efforts at maintaining
3 > uniformity and cleanliness.
4 >
5
6 Like allowing that devs may or may not use games.eclass, so that users
7 cannot expect consistent behavior for games anymore?
8
9 Instead of ignoring the games project _again_ and making decisions above
10 their heads... try to fix the project maybe?
11
12 Is this becoming a habit now? People who are rarely involved in any
13 games ebuild development suddenly know how games ebuild consistency
14 should look like.

Replies