| 1 |
[just to make sure that everybody will hear that] |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Thursday 26 May 2005 01:37, Duncan wrote: |
| 4 |
> That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4? |
| 5 |
> I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to |
| 6 |
> that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^( |
| 7 |
It will be *completely* disabled. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-fvisibility=hidden *must not* be used if the project isn't supposed to use |
| 10 |
only its own code without linking to other libraries, as that kills the RTTI |
| 11 |
stuff. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It's not a fault in GCC, it's a fault in the way -fvisibility=hidden was used |
| 14 |
by KDE. |
| 15 |
KDE 3.5 and 4 will have the right visibility support enabled just for KDE |
| 16 |
stuff instead of messing around with QT and other libraries which doesn't use |
| 17 |
that consistently. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Please note that every try to use -fvisibility=hidden in CFLAGS will result in |
| 20 |
*great* problems which won't be supported at all. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
Archives