| 1 |
Hi |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an official |
| 4 |
> dev. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Answering my own question (for the record). I found some explanation here: |
| 7 |
http://lycos.dropcode.net/gregarius/author.php?author=Roy_Marples__uberlord_ |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
>> Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a baselayout |
| 10 |
>> replacement? How likely is this to be on-track to become a "gentoo |
| 11 |
>> official" baselayout? Do you (try to) support busybox and vserver |
| 12 |
>> environments? |
| 13 |
> Don't know. Yes. Very. Yes & Yes. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Excellent - this is exciting to hear |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage |
| 18 |
(and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that |
| 19 |
in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and |
| 20 |
starting to push it out to users? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Would it not make sense to start to snapshot some builds and push openrc |
| 23 |
out for testing? (Seems like a gentoo job rather than an upstream is |
| 24 |
the reason I ask here?) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Cheers |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Ed W |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives