| 1 |
On 14 Mar 2015 23:14, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 2 |
> I've long considered the -delete argument to find to be widely supported |
| 3 |
> enough that using it in ebuilds should not be a problem. Indeed, a grep |
| 4 |
> of the tree shows that it is frequently used, even in eclasses. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I've just noticed that the man page states that it is not present in |
| 7 |
> the BSD version. findutils is now included in @system, even on BSD, but |
| 8 |
> the ebuild looks as though it gets installed as gfind rather than find. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
ebuilds may assume GNU findutils |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> On a related note, should I ever include findutils in DEPEND? I've seen |
| 13 |
> some instances of this, occasionally conditional on userland_GNU. On |
| 14 |
> the one hand, it should always be present now, given what I said about |
| 15 |
> @system above but on the other hand, if it gets installed as gfind then |
| 16 |
> there's no point in pulling it in if you're only going to call find. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
no |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives