| 1 |
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:36:00AM +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 27 December 2005 03:11, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Never said anything about 2.1 + resolver enhancements (no clue where |
| 4 |
> > that one came from). Merely commenting on your raised issues about |
| 5 |
> > use/slot deps. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> From your words. Thanks for destroying my hope in two sentences. ;p |
| 8 |
> So we add this dependency enhancement without having a Portage version in |
| 9 |
> place that can resolve issues as they appeare!?! Scary. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Who said anything about this going into portage _without_ the resolver |
| 12 |
enhancements? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Re-read my emails, I've stated the resolver improvements are |
| 15 |
*required* for use/slot to go in (specifically use). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So... yeah, you're not following what I've been saying. |
| 18 |
~harring |
Archives