1 |
* Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
<snip> |
4 |
|
5 |
> I would be shot if it was automated; |
6 |
> |
7 |
> i will soon have some nifty bash scripts to generate e-mails and the |
8 |
> pmask file, but they aren't done yet. |
9 |
|
10 |
The problem is: how to get the bugs assigned to certain package versions ? |
11 |
|
12 |
I did not yet see any consistent syntax for version information in |
13 |
the bugs. |
14 |
|
15 |
Could we add fields for package name and version in bugzilla ? |
16 |
This should allow an easy querying. |
17 |
|
18 |
Perhaps we could get this done better with an little (cmdline ?) |
19 |
tool for bug-reporting, which collects the necessary information |
20 |
by itself. |
21 |
|
22 |
For example: |
23 |
|
24 |
foo:/ # bug-report findutils |
25 |
Reporting bug for: sys-apps/findutils-4.3.0 |
26 |
|
27 |
Enter description (press CTRL-D): |
28 |
|
29 |
.... |
30 |
|
31 |
... posting bug ... added ID: 238472 |
32 |
|
33 |
foo:/ # |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
If bugs of certain packages get reported this way, we could put |
37 |
virtually anything (package list, use flags, mask file, ...) into it, |
38 |
and the doesn't have to even think about what could be needed. |
39 |
This also could take some load from the bug-wranglers, since these |
40 |
bugs could be directly assigned to the appropriate package/herd |
41 |
mainatainers. |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
cu |
45 |
-- |
46 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
47 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
48 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
49 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
50 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
51 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
52 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
53 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |