| 1 |
On Thursday 21 August 2003 15:11, Patrick Kursawe wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:01:17AM +0200, Patrick Kursawe wrote: |
| 3 |
> > =media-libs/divx4linux-20020418* |
| 4 |
> > !media-libs/divx4linux-2003* |
| 5 |
> > (in both DEPEND and RDEPEND) |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > which just makes nvrec downgrade divx4linux before it's installed, but |
| 8 |
> > does not stop me from upgrading it afterwards (which breaks nvrec). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Indeed it looks like adding a version to a blocked package just results |
| 11 |
> in ignoring the line. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> (portage-2.0.48-r5) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
First post on this list... just a lowly user... tell me to keep my nose out if |
| 16 |
necessary! ;-) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I recently updated to gcc 3.3 and was having a hard time as portage kept on |
| 19 |
wanting to downgrade it. Turned out that glibc-2.3.2-r1 wanted a lower |
| 20 |
version and I had to unmask glibc-2.3.2-r3 to keep gcc as it was. Point is |
| 21 |
glibc-2.3.2-r1 contains nothing gcc-related in RDEPEND and only the following |
| 22 |
in DEPEND: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
=sys-devel/gcc-3.2* |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Also using portage-2.0.48-r5. Makes me think it's something else causing it to |
| 27 |
not take notice of the dep. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
Jason |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives