1 |
On Friday 21 October 2005 04:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:49 pm, Dan Meltzer wrote: |
3 |
> > Why single out this one? ones system will not break irreperbly |
4 |
> > without a cxx compiler, it'll just cause a another recompile to get it |
5 |
> > to work after breakage if the person is using -* (which has already |
6 |
> > been said to be hackish and ill-advised, so doom on them! |
7 |
> |
8 |
> it will actually |
9 |
> |
10 |
> if you build gcc w/out C++ support that means no libstdc++ |
11 |
> |
12 |
> no libstdc++ means python on most boxes is now broken |
13 |
> |
14 |
> no python means no emerge |
15 |
> |
16 |
> how exactly are you going to re-emerge gcc then ? oh, you cant ... |
17 |
> -mike |
18 |
|
19 |
Can you think of a situation where this is desired? If not, why not remove the |
20 |
cxx IUSE and always build the C++-component? |
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |