Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 19:18:58
Message-Id: 8a8e6d9b01026982ee79f99587871193fbcc39d0.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. by Piotr Karbowski
1 On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 19:26 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
2 >
3 > And none of which happens unless you intentionally trigger it.
4 >
5 > ...
6 >
7 > Sure, acl and how chmod manipulate mask on ACL-enabled entities is not
8 > very simple, but nothing will break by itself just because you have acl
9 > support enabled, you would need to try very hard to run into problems.
10 >
11 >
12
13 Even if you're right, and if no other tools invoke tar, and the user is
14 smart enough not to copy/paste commands from the web, and if no other
15 archivers can extract ACLs when invoked directly or indirectly...
16 you're still burdening the user to either have faith that this is all
17 true, or to verify it himself. Repeat the argument for other flags like
18 ipv6, and you wind up requiring either a lot of faith, or a lot of
19 diligence, both of which are antithetical to basic principles of
20 security.
21
22 You may not buy the argument, but it's why people disable this stuff,
23 and the ability to disable it is why a lot of our users user Gentoo to
24 begin with.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. Piotr Karbowski <slashbeast@g.o>