1 |
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 01:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> On 05:30 Tue 01 Jul , Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |
4 |
> > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |
5 |
> > Gentoo dev list to see. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Here's the proposed agenda. Please respond if I forgot something, it's |
8 |
> unclear, or you have another suggestion. As before, since we have an |
9 |
> agenda in advance we won't be holding an open floor. |
10 |
|
11 |
I'll try to clarify my second agenda item on an absolute ban. Also I |
12 |
might edit my private request to make it pure vanilla and send it out, |
13 |
too, so that people may cross check my summary if they wish. If people |
14 |
want that, please respond saying so. |
15 |
|
16 |
1. Your summary in the agenda is a fair reading of my request. |
17 |
However, I don't think it's realistic to expect a decision within a week |
18 |
because I think instituting a policy and procedure allowing a complete |
19 |
ban forever from Gentoo requires at the least a change to the Code of |
20 |
Conduct and a review cycle for that. |
21 |
|
22 |
2. I can't spell out exactly what people are thinking of when |
23 |
discussing absolute bans, because I get the sense that different people |
24 |
have different ideas about just what we would mean by that. So I think |
25 |
the first step is for someone who advocates such a procedure needs to |
26 |
spell out exactly what it would be and why we would do it and under |
27 |
whose authority, etc. As probably everyone knows, I am absolutely |
28 |
opposed to any such thing, so I am not the person to do this. |
29 |
|
30 |
3. So, I don't think we can reach a decision on anything until we are |
31 |
all clear on what we are deciding on. |
32 |
|
33 |
4. Here's what I think is meant by a complete ban. *These are only my |
34 |
own inferences from reading between the lines and trying to put |
35 |
different comments together in some coherent fashion.* |
36 |
Under some rather unclear conditions, some combination of |
37 |
devrel/userrel/trustees/infra could decide to impose a complete, |
38 |
permanent ban on a member (user or, I suppose developer) of our |
39 |
community. This would have the following effects: |
40 |
a. The person could post to no gentoo mailing list; |
41 |
b. The person could not post to gentoo bugzilla; |
42 |
c. The person could not participate in #gentoo- IRC |
43 |
channels (although this runs into conflict with individual |
44 |
channel policy); |
45 |
d. The person could not contribute to gentoo (hence my corner |
46 |
case of a security fix) except perhaps through a proxy; |
47 |
e. (Perhaps any upstream projects in which the person banned |
48 |
would be notified of the ban??? --- I'm not sure). |
49 |
Right now, I don't know anymore if what I just described is what is |
50 |
being proposed or not. |
51 |
|
52 |
5. I am told that nothing is forever, and that if whatever problems |
53 |
triggered such a ban were corrected, the ban might be lifted. I note, |
54 |
however, that since the banned person could not participate in Gentoo |
55 |
things, as a practical matter we'd never know if anything was corrected |
56 |
or not. (Except through 3rd parties.) |
57 |
|
58 |
6. Presumably, all of this would be done in secret and whoever is being |
59 |
hit by such a ban would have no opportunity to respond before the ban's |
60 |
imposition. I suppose there would be a right to appeal to council, |
61 |
assuming council took no part in deciding on the ban. |
62 |
|
63 |
7. [Argument] I view this as a pretty major change in how Gentoo |
64 |
operates. So someone needs to clarify my inferences in paragraph 4, and |
65 |
then we should think very carefully about it before allowing for any |
66 |
such practice. |
67 |
|
68 |
8. [Argument] I note that we are likely to institute some form of |
69 |
possible moderation for the gentoo-dev mailing list (presumably based on |
70 |
Code of Conduct violations), and if we do that, it effectively satisfies |
71 |
the intent of any absolute ban, but is not nearly so traumatic to the |
72 |
system. I note that this is a minority view among those who have |
73 |
discussed this. |
74 |
|
75 |
Donnie, |
76 |
I don't know if that clarifies anything or just makes things more |
77 |
confusing. It's the best I can come up with. |
78 |
|
79 |
Regards, |
80 |
Ferris |
81 |
-- |
82 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
83 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |