Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o>
To: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Cc: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Need help with sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.42.11 build failure
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:48:12
Message-Id: 20140721104750.0526f15c@shanghai.paradoxon.rec
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Need help with sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.42.11 build failure by Mike Gilbert
1 On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:12:17 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote:
2
3 >On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
4 >wrote:
5 >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Lars Wendler
6 >> <polynomial-c@g.o> wrote:
7 >>> Hi guys,
8 >>>
9 >>> I just add e2fsprogs{,-libs}-1.42.11
10 >>
11 >> Is there some reason that we continue to maintain these as two
12 >> separate packages? It seems like the e2fsprogs ebuild could
13 >> build/install both the binaries and the libraries, and that would
14 >> probably prevent weird failures like this one.
15 >>
16 >> I see this in README.subset:
17 >
18 >Oops, hit send too quickly.
19 >
20 >I see this in README.subset:
21 >
22 >---
23 >This distribution contains a subset of the e2fsprogs package; it
24 >contains the base libraries (ss, et, uuid, blkid) which may be used by
25 >other non-ext2-related applications.
26 >
27 >This may be useful for non-Linux operating systems that need these
28 >libraries for GNOME, but who do not need the ext2/ext3 filesystem
29 >utilities.
30 >---
31 >
32 >From what I can tell, e2fsprogs and e2fsprogs-libs have mostly the
33 >same KEYWORDS with a couple of exceptions:
34 >
35 >x86-fbsd
36 >x86-freebsd
37 >x86-solaris
38 >
39 >It hardly seems worth the effort to maintain 2 ebuilds for these small
40 >platforms.
41 >
42
43 I think vapier could shed some light on this.
44
45 --
46 Lars Wendler
47 Gentoo package maintainer
48 GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature