1 |
On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:12:17 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |
4 |
>wrote: |
5 |
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Lars Wendler |
6 |
>> <polynomial-c@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
>>> Hi guys, |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> I just add e2fsprogs{,-libs}-1.42.11 |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Is there some reason that we continue to maintain these as two |
12 |
>> separate packages? It seems like the e2fsprogs ebuild could |
13 |
>> build/install both the binaries and the libraries, and that would |
14 |
>> probably prevent weird failures like this one. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> I see this in README.subset: |
17 |
> |
18 |
>Oops, hit send too quickly. |
19 |
> |
20 |
>I see this in README.subset: |
21 |
> |
22 |
>--- |
23 |
>This distribution contains a subset of the e2fsprogs package; it |
24 |
>contains the base libraries (ss, et, uuid, blkid) which may be used by |
25 |
>other non-ext2-related applications. |
26 |
> |
27 |
>This may be useful for non-Linux operating systems that need these |
28 |
>libraries for GNOME, but who do not need the ext2/ext3 filesystem |
29 |
>utilities. |
30 |
>--- |
31 |
> |
32 |
>From what I can tell, e2fsprogs and e2fsprogs-libs have mostly the |
33 |
>same KEYWORDS with a couple of exceptions: |
34 |
> |
35 |
>x86-fbsd |
36 |
>x86-freebsd |
37 |
>x86-solaris |
38 |
> |
39 |
>It hardly seems worth the effort to maintain 2 ebuilds for these small |
40 |
>platforms. |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
I think vapier could shed some light on this. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Lars Wendler |
47 |
Gentoo package maintainer |
48 |
GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC |