| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 11:11 schrieb Stuart Herbert: |
| 3 |
> > On 9/7/06, Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here: |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626 |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Am I the only one who has a problem with this? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > No. And I'm sure I'm not the only one who has a problem with your |
| 11 |
> > comment in that bug either. Bugzilla isn't there for flaming other |
| 12 |
> > devs. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > There was a time when we used to suspend devs for doing that. |
| 15 |
> Sadly we don't suspend developers for extended history of QA violations. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Not true, unfortunately these problems seem to very rarely get |
| 19 |
communicated to devrel... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 23 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives