Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Pacho Ramos <pacho@××××××××××××××××××××××××.es>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:16:25
Message-Id: 201001080200.57580.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January by Pacho Ramos
1 On Saturday 02 January 2010 13:21:05 Pacho Ramos wrote:
2 > El vie, 01-01-2010 a las 13:31 +0000, Mike Frysinger escribió:
3 > > This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
4 > > the 3rd Thursday at 1800 UTC / 2000 CET / 1400 EST), same bat channel
5 > > (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
6 > >
7 > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
8 > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
9 > > Gentoo dev list to see.
10 > >
11 > > Keep in mind that every GLEP *re*submission to the council for review
12 > > must first be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list 7 days (minimum)
13 > > before being submitted as an agenda item which itself occurs 7 days
14 > > before the meeting. Simply put, the gentoo-dev mailing list must be
15 > > notified at least 14 days before the meeting itself.
16 > >
17 > > For more info on the Gentoo Council, feel free to browse our homepage:
18 > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
19 >
20 > I would like to know what was finally decided about "Adding real
21 > multilib features from current multilib-portage to currently hardmasked
22 > and testing portage-2.2*", as I failed to see if, finally, an approval
23 > from the council is needed for merging it to portage-2.2 or not and, if
24 > needed, if it will be discussed finally on this meeting.
25
26 the multilib discussion hasnt moved past the development stages yet, so
27 there's nothing to be discussed by the council or merged by the portage team.
28 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature