1 |
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 22:13 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote: |
2 |
> Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 16 May 2006 21:35, Luis Francisco Araujo wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> >>Sorry if i am confusing things here, but isn't this just _yet_ another |
6 |
> >>profile that |
7 |
> >>the user can choose to use? |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > A profile in the tree has to be supported by someone. |
10 |
> > It's also more likely that people would try it out without knowing what they |
11 |
> > are going to open. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > An overlay makes users more conscious that they are going to require manual |
14 |
> > work and they have to know where to look for support. If it's in portage, |
15 |
> > it's more likely that users won't look at it deeply and just think that "it's |
16 |
> > portage, so goes to gentoo bugzilla". |
17 |
> |
18 |
> See /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/dev/README :) |
19 |
|
20 |
Yeah, except that's a lie. I actually do support it. That is mostly |
21 |
there to let people know that I do play around in there and have been |
22 |
known to break things in the past. It is where I do all of the profile |
23 |
work before a release, so I might play with ideas that do things that a |
24 |
user might not want. |
25 |
|
26 |
Basically, I don't follow the same "be very careful before adding stuff" |
27 |
mantra in there as I would on default-linux/x86. That being said, I |
28 |
don't put anything there that I don't have *somebody* out there testing, |
29 |
so it's known to work on at least a few systems. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Chris Gianelloni |
33 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
34 |
x86 Architecture Team |
35 |
Games - Developer |
36 |
Gentoo Linux |