Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo activity graphs
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:53:57
Message-Id: 20060707225915.4e06ad8d@c1358217.kevquinn.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo activity graphs by Chris Bainbridge
1 On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 20:53:12 +0100
2 "Chris Bainbridge" <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On 07/07/06, Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> wrote:
5 > > I am aware those characteristics are quantitative and don't say
6 > > anything
7 > > about the quality of the distribution. However, judging after those
8 > > graphs, even the worst basher will recognize that we are far from
9 > > being dead.
10 >
11 > It may be a better metric to look at the bugzilla stats. How has the
12 > number of bugs being filed changed? What ratio of filed bugs are
13 > resolved, vs the ones that are left open? bugs.gentoo.org has some
14 > facilities for graphing stats back to December 2005...
15
16 There's information on this in the GWN. However I'm not sure it's
17 accurate; over the last two months, new bugs filed has consistently
18 been double the number of bugs closed or resolved; typically some
19 700-800 new bugs a week and 300-400 closed/resolved a week - however the
20 total number of open bugs over the same period has increased by just
21 372 bugs from 9947 to 10319 (total new + reopened - closed = 3791).
22
23 --
24 Kevin F. Quinn

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature