Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:45:55
Message-Id: pan.2011.10.11.05.44.46@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation by Ryan Hill
1 Ryan Hill posted on Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:13:15 -0600 as excerpted:
2
3 > I try to overcome that obstacle with the gcc-porting overlay. I try to
4 > stick all the patches that haven't been applied to the main tree in
5 > there. (try being the key word - I really dropped the ball this release
6 > cycle as I was graduating and then got stuck working 80hr weeks for a
7 > few months.)
8
9 Thanks, BTW. I really haven't tried 4.6 yet either, for similar work-
10 related time constraint reasons, and IIRC that overlay hasn't been around
11 for /too/ many cycles, so I've not really had a chance to use it.
12
13 But thanks for the effort. It is appreciated, and I now have that
14 overlay on my mental checklist for the next time I /do/ decide to unmask
15 gcc. Having gone thru several cycles without it, I'm already sure it's
16 going to be /quite/ a benefit. =:^)
17
18 --
19 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
20 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
21 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman