Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Torsten Veller <tove@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Need to mask non-visible packages in package.mask?
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:17:51
Message-Id: 20081229195554.TA0cd23.tv@veller.net
1 Some time ago (31 Oct 2008) I renamed
2 perl-core/File-Spec-3.2701 to perl-core/File-Spec-3.27.01
3 by adding the new file and removing the other.
4
5 I expected portage to do an downgrade.
6
7 It didn't.
8
9 I realised it when i got this bug <https://bugs.gentoo.org/248178>
10 and after joining #-portage I add a mask for a non-existing package to
11 package.mask.
12
13 Today I was CC'ed to https://bugs.gentoo.org/105016 because "package.mask
14 contains invalid entries".
15
16 In the meantime another bug was filed about portage "doesn't attempt to
17 downgrade packages on keyword changes..." <https://bugs.gentoo.org/252167>
18 with a fix.
19
20
21 I am confused. Will portage warn about the downgrade now and forever?

Replies