1 |
Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 20.09 +0100, Thomas Beierlein ha scritto: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> If I read the discussion correctly we will still need to keep |
4 |
> these .la |
5 |
> files around. |
6 |
> |
7 |
Most likely, yes… you can go a bit deeper about them (for instance |
8 |
PulseAudio can load its plugins with libltdl even if the .la files are |
9 |
not around, and the author _always_ recommended removing them), but |
10 |
that's probably something we don't have to care about so much as it is. |
11 |
|
12 |
For what concerns the list I provided, that's just the output of the |
13 |
tinderbox in the case of hamlib, it was _Hamlib.la that triggered it, it |
14 |
is installed in the Python tree and Python does not use .la files. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” |
18 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
19 |
|
20 |
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, |
21 |
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ |