| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/15/2013 11:00 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 10/15/2013 09:53 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 10 |
>>>>>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive |
| 11 |
>>>>>> project leaders/members and remove them from the |
| 12 |
>>>>>> projects in case there has not been any activity for a |
| 13 |
>>>>>> while, regardless of the internal project structure. |
| 14 |
>>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>>>> Authority does not only come with knowledge, but also |
| 16 |
>>>>>> with commitment. |
| 17 |
>>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>>>> If no one disagrees, then we should add this to the list |
| 19 |
>>>>>> of undertakers competence. |
| 20 |
>>>>> |
| 21 |
>>>>> |
| 22 |
>>>>> We already check for inactive members (developers and |
| 23 |
>>>>> leaders are the same for us) |
| 24 |
>>>>> |
| 25 |
>>>>> What's is this thread for? |
| 26 |
>>>>> |
| 27 |
>>>>> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
>>>> You probably misunderstood. I didn't mean inactive in |
| 30 |
>>>> general, but inactive in a _project_. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
>>> Err no. That's not our job. If the project has an inactive |
| 34 |
>>> leader or member it's the leaders job (or team's job if the |
| 35 |
>>> leader is inactive) to sort this out internally. If that |
| 36 |
>>> fails, then they should seek help. undertakers do not have (and |
| 37 |
>>> neither want) the authority to remove active developers from |
| 38 |
>>> certain projects. If a project appears to be dead even though |
| 39 |
>>> it's members (and/or leader) are active in other Gentoo areas, |
| 40 |
>>> and they refuse to fix the situation, you may want to take this |
| 41 |
>>> to the Council. Seem like you need to re-read |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
>> I have read that and that is why I propose that undertakers do |
| 48 |
>> also check projects for their internal activity patterns. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
>> I don't really think that is a job for the council. |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> Sorry it's not going to happen. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
ok. |
| 56 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 57 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 58 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXa7MAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz9p8H/iBE3B5vQfqhWcd8vMwyG8oI |
| 61 |
5bjkQ/7Dq1CVPB/7h16oR6fiSauI5I2d+PNL/uSTacfA0j1SVsUEtWKjeMM5eL2u |
| 62 |
1doyB/o+z6Bww5LNYjnH/F8jHloJP/83bNmpDJZS/Mqb+0TrJ61EeimLcEBTBn7m |
| 63 |
1laT8ulxsIwypD/Blut7zcsvUQoazE9JlnLONO7i6eRMS0vEJLJTiHmSKLDB4Fv5 |
| 64 |
xoqvMJG5/6c1+EgKQzPxGUN0wo6Zw8aLTpSUkcYnacAAKzm+HGtBpvze2G1pv7eF |
| 65 |
Cu6XD4SHC9MMrKjdbxRyHso2f3N38sMC7SDnLKEOrrNus/M+OGtY25iv7zAQkmY= |
| 66 |
=gA6U |
| 67 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives