| 1 |
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:32 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> All, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> from what I'm seeing, we should look into converting /etc/mtab to a |
| 6 |
>> symlink to /proc/self/mounts [1]. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Are there any remaining concerns about doing this? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> If not, it seems like it would be pretty easy to make baselayout create |
| 11 |
>> this symlink in the stages (I'm willing to do this work), but what about |
| 12 |
>> on systems that are already installed? Should we send out a news item |
| 13 |
>> and have everyone convert their /etc/mtab manually or find a way to |
| 14 |
>> automate that? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> William |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477498 |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Is the issue with NFS user mounts resolved? (Mentioned |
| 21 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Systemd#.2Fetc.2Fmtab and elsewhere) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Could someone using NFS actually test and see if there are any |
| 25 |
problems? That comment on the wiki has no details, and Google has not |
| 26 |
been very helpful in finding an answer. |
Archives