1 |
El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 22:25 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
2 |
> On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
3 |
> > El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
4 |
> >> It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs, |
5 |
> >> installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible |
6 |
> >> broken .png files within packages. |
7 |
> >> The problem is broken IDAT lenght, an error that libpng15 still |
8 |
> >> gracefully ignored, but libpng16 no longer ignores. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> The bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/468386 |
11 |
> >> List created by Tobias at 2013 May, |
12 |
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=347306 |
13 |
> >> <mailto:klausman@g.o> |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> This has been discussed on the ML before, and most important packages |
16 |
> >> got already fixed, but there are packages still |
17 |
> >> left. Any help addressing the issue is welcome, and I'm sending this |
18 |
> >> mail in hopes people will see packages on the lists |
19 |
> >> that intrest them, and fix them. |
20 |
> >> |
21 |
> >> Thanks, |
22 |
> >> Samuli |
23 |
> >> <mailto:klausman@g.o> |
24 |
> >> |
25 |
> > If there exists a tool that detects that broken png files, maybe a QA |
26 |
> > portage check (like the one used to detect broken .desktop files) could |
27 |
> > be added to help to detect and fix the problematic images :/ |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Pretty good idea, there is the script in python, and Portage is python, |
32 |
> maybe it can be adopted somehow. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> The script is at, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466190#c11 |
35 |
> |
36 |
> - Samuli |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
Probably we will need to open a bug report, do you prefer to report that |
40 |
one or should I? ;) |