| 1 |
On 26/06/2003 at 12:46:08(-0400), Stewart used 3.8K just to say: |
| 2 |
> If an ebuild is, for whatever reason, broken enough to warrant a |
| 3 |
> revision bump, does it really conpute to leave it in the tree while |
| 4 |
> removing a perfectly viable, if only older build in its stead? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I couldn't agree more. A nice example would be bug #12844. I am still reluctant |
| 7 |
of doing "emerge '>netscape-flash-6'" |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-- |
| 10 |
/\ Georgi Georgiev /\ "...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known /\ |
| 11 |
\/ chutz@×××.net \/ as the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly)." (By \/ |
| 12 |
/\ +81(90)6266-1163 /\ Matt Welsh) /\ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives