| 1 |
Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 7/27/06, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
>> The "majority" of packages are also the ones that need more extensive |
| 5 |
>> testing. Sure, we could probably stabilize a bunch of the fringe |
| 6 |
>> packages that hardly anyone uses and it wouldn't affect anything. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> The majority of Aliz's database seems to be made up of these "fringe" |
| 9 |
> packages. Many of which are stable on at least one arch already, or |
| 10 |
> have only a single version in the tree anyway. Stabilizing these on |
| 11 |
> the remaining archs that they support should not have any significant |
| 12 |
> impact on the perceived overall quality of Gentoo. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I was planning on working through the list some time in the near future. I have |
| 15 |
to finish filing GCC 4.1 stabilization bugs for half the tree first. ;) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
--de. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives