Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:11:31
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots by "Michał Górny"
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:09:03 +0200
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
> > That's just it, though -- this no longer holds. -r300 is now being > > used for something that is exactly the same version as -r200. > > Did you look at SONAME?
Look at SONAME before deciding what package to install? Kindly explain how that works.
> > > > and that the jruby implementation is not "a > > > > newer version" than the ruby 1.8 implementation. > > > > > > And that's another thing which is ugly and should be replaced by > > > something sane rather than worked around. > > > > I agree. But until that happens, which probably isn't going to be > > anytime soon, we need to know where something weird is happening, > > and that's what this proposal provides. > > Yes, let's introduce some random 'funky' word for a single ebuild. > Or.. since it's just a single package, maybe you would just add an > ignore list to paludis.
a) it's not a single package, and b) ignore lists in a package manager is a terrible idea. -- Ciaran McCreesh


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>