| 1 |
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 20:09:03 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > That's just it, though -- this no longer holds. -r300 is now being |
| 4 |
> > used for something that is exactly the same version as -r200. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Did you look at SONAME? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Look at SONAME before deciding what package to install? Kindly explain |
| 9 |
how that works. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > > > and that the jruby implementation is not "a |
| 12 |
> > > > newer version" than the ruby 1.8 implementation. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > And that's another thing which is ugly and should be replaced by |
| 15 |
> > > something sane rather than worked around. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > I agree. But until that happens, which probably isn't going to be |
| 18 |
> > anytime soon, we need to know where something weird is happening, |
| 19 |
> > and that's what this proposal provides. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Yes, let's introduce some random 'funky' word for a single ebuild. |
| 22 |
> Or.. since it's just a single package, maybe you would just add an |
| 23 |
> ignore list to paludis. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
a) it's not a single package, and b) ignore lists in a package manager |
| 26 |
is a terrible idea. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives