| 1 |
On 16-06-2016 19:37:55 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:52:32 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On 16-06-2016 16:37:10 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > P.S. Please don't CC me when replying to my e-mails on the list, |
| 7 |
> > > > since I'm already subscribed to the list. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Please don't expect others to keep blacklists of people who can't |
| 10 |
> > > handle their mail properly, or to generally harm others and ignore good |
| 11 |
> > > practices because you can't handle your mail. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > You mean ignoring the Reply-To header is "good practice"? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It's not being ignored, as you can see by the occurrence of the mailing |
| 16 |
> list in CC. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
From RFC 5322: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the address(es) to |
| 21 |
which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent. In the |
| 22 |
absence of the "Reply-To:" field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to |
| 23 |
the mailbox(es) specified in the "From:" field unless otherwise |
| 24 |
specified by the person composing the reply. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
In other words, you sent it to me, while I requested you to send it to |
| 27 |
the list. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 32 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives