| 1 |
On 05/24/2012 01:52 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 25 May 2012 08:28, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> I expect that reading and validating the cache is probably not going to |
| 5 |
>> be much faster than just parsing the eclasses over again. |
| 6 |
>> -- |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Unless, you don't care if the cache is out-dated because the cache is |
| 9 |
> optional / the syntax checking is optional, and its only made |
| 10 |
> available when you generate it manually. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Putting the responsibility of cache validation on the user is not really |
| 13 |
an option here, because it's just going to lead to bug reports of the |
| 14 |
form "repoman is using stale eclass info in its checks". |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Thanks, |
| 17 |
Zac |
Archives