| 1 |
Hi there |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I haven't search the mailing list. Please forgive me if the discussion was |
| 4 |
already started earlier by someone else. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
After posting and closing the bug report: |
| 7 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135870 |
| 8 |
Jakub Moc noticed that the current >=virtual/x11-7.0 ebuild misses its task |
| 9 |
and creates trouble. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For example: This ebuild behaves partly like a ordinary meta build and |
| 12 |
installs imake. You need imake (more correctly xmfmk) to install tightvnc. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Unfortunately you are not forced to install at least virtual/x11-7.0-r1. |
| 15 |
virtual/x11-7.0 causes trouble with tightvnc because of the missing |
| 16 |
xmfmk tool. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
For that reason I want to request the deletion of virtual/x11-7.0 and |
| 19 |
that at least some dependencies of virtual/x11 are moved to |
| 20 |
=>x11-base/xorg-x11-7.0 where these dependencies belong to IMHO. xorg-x11 is |
| 21 |
a meta ebuild. virtual/x11 shouldn't be a second meta ebuild for the |
| 22 |
Modular X.org because otherwise you would have two meta ebuilds that will |
| 23 |
maybe cause more trouble in the future. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks and best regards |
| 26 |
@4u |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives